Are You Cascading Your Strategy, or Fragmenting It?

INTRODUCTION

The typical approach executive teams use to cascade, or roll out, their strategic direction is to produce a clear set of goals, objectives, critical success factors or a scorecard and then get each departmental or functional manager to take this on board and customize it for their part of the organisation. The trouble then begins?

A TYPICAL APPROACH: EACH DEPARTMENT ADOPTS OR ADAPTS A VERSION OF THE CORPORATE STRATEGY

The first phase of most organisational planning processes is that the organisation's executives design and express a strategic direction using a framework of some kind. Commonly this framework will be something like a collection of key result areas or critical success factors or balanced scorecard (1) perspectives or triple (or quadruple) bottom line, and so on. Strategic goals or objectives will be developed within each part of this strategic framework, along with a set of key performance indicators (fondly nicknamed KPIs by the majority of the English speaking business world).

For example, a Key Result Area of "Customer Focus" has a strategic goal of "raise customer advocacy to 25%", which is measured by % Customer Referrals. Another goal for this Key Result Area is "increase customer satisfaction to 95%", measured by % Customers Satisfied. For a Key Result Area of "Sustainable Profitability", a strategic goal of "increase profit by 100%" is measured by EBIT (Earnings Before Interest & Tax). Another goal for this Key Result Area is "reduce costs by 20%" is measured by Total Expenditure.

The next phase is often to communicate the strategy to the rest of the organisation, with a view to encouraging the next layer of management to translate it into a tactical or operational level strategy. And here's what happens next: functional managers (of business units or departments or whatever you call the parts that your organisation is divided and organized into) create their own set of goals, aimed at contributing to the achievement of the organisation's strategic goals.

For example, the Corporate Services Department, the part that manages the internal support processes like purchasing and payroll and information services, translates the Key Result Area of "Customer Focus" into a goal to "increase internal customer satisfaction with our services", measured by % Internal Customers Satisfied. And for the Key Result Area of "Sustainable Profitability", they set a goal to "reduce consumables costs by 20%", measured of course by Consumables Expenditure.

In other words, the Corporate Services Department takes a look at the corporate strategy and translates it as best it can into its own operational strategy. They see the goal of customer advocacy and decides it's not really a goal that's relevant to them, as their customers can only ever be the internal customers of the organisation. They consider momentarily selling their services to other organisations, but discount it as it would increase costs too much, preventing them from achieving the organisation's expenditure reduction goal. Next, they see the customer satisfaction goal and know straight away how important that is to them. So they establish a goal around internal customer satisfaction. And then they see the profitability goal, and realize the next best thing for them is budget performance, that's what they'll put in as their profitability equivalent. But the next corporate goal of reducing costs is certainly something that relates to them, at least in part. They can't really reduce their labour costs, as the rest of the organisation already puts more demand on them than they can effectively meet, so they establish an operational goal of reducing their consumables expenditure.

And it can be even more specific. A corporate target for downsizing (head count reduction, right sizing, whatever you call it - getting rid of people, basically) is 10%. So every department is expected to reduce its size by 10%, irrespective of whether the department has the scope to downsize by 30%, or whether it is already struggling with the insufficient number of people it has now. Or a corporate safety goal is to reduce the lost time injury frequency rate or LTIFR (2) to 8. So every department is expected to achieve an LTIFR of 8, irrespective of whether their starting point is 9 or 42. Cascading targets like this, needless to say, causes all kinds of chaos and sub-optimisation and cynicism and wasted resources and missed opportunities? and more often than not, the corporate target never being achieved.

Have you seen this pattern of thinking play out before? Is this the approach you take to cascading strategy in your organisation? If so, you may very well be experiencing some of the common obstacles that come with cascading strategy this way.

A COMMON EXPERIENCE: TYPICAL IMPLEMENTATION PROBLEMS

Have you experienced any of these implementation problems in the act of cascading your organisational strategy?

problem #1: some of the strategic goals seem irrelevant to your department

One of the typical implementation problems is the discovery that there is a goal (or two, or more) in the corporate scorecard that your department can't sensibly adopt or even adapt. For many departments that don't have external customers, for example, they obviously have no use of a goal about customer loyalty or customer referrals. Nor do they have any use of a goal about profitability. For departments that are already struggling to cope with the resources they have, cost cutting even further just because it's a strategic goal really puts the pressure on.

problem #2: some of the strategic goals seem too high level for your department

Another typical problem is that when a team sits down to develop their own operational strategy, they have a really hard time trying to connect with the corporate goals. They struggle to relate the long range, all-encompassing corporate goal to what they can do and influence in the shorter term. Like a corporate goal of enhanced corporate image, how do they set themselves a goal that relates to this? Or a corporate goal of customer value, how specifically should they translate this into something more concrete for them?

problem #3: some of the strategic goals overlook what is really important to your department

It's another of those most common experiences with cascading strategy - the strategy doesn't cover some of those things that you know still really matter for your department. Like equipment reliability for the maintenance department, or employee turnover for the human resources department, or employee competence for the organisational development department, or supplier relationships for the purchasing department. Where do they make space for these in their operational strategy? Leave them out, or tack them on the end somehow?

problem #4: achieving the corporate targets would sabotage other areas of performance

When a corporate target is set and cascaded to every department on an 'equitable' basis (that is, every one achieves the same numeric level of performance), many departments are faced with a change so large that their allocated resources are completely insufficient to achieve it, or they are faced with a making a change that will directly prevent them from achieving or even maintaining another performance result. They are locked into producing a result that is ultimately damaging to the organisation.

A SHAKY ASSUMPTION: THE WHOLE SUCCEEDS IF EACH PART SUCCEEDS

Each of the typical implementation problems with cascading organisational strategy in the common way is spawned from the same underlying (and very shaky) assumption - that for the whole organisation to achieve its strategic goals or targets, each part of the organisation needs to achieve similar goals or targets. Almost like the notion that to make a big elephant, you need to join lots of small elephants together.

Of course that's a ridiculous notion. But for some reason, we've been applying it to the method by which an organisation achieves its strategic direction. To make an organisation, you don't need to join lots of smaller organisations together. You need to bring groups of people together, that can each perform different and complimentary functions that make the whole organisation capable of performing end to end processes like developing products and services that the market require, and marketing products and services to generate customer interest, and delivering products and services to satisfy the expectations of customers.

It's the processes of the organisation that make it live, just like our processes of breathing and feeding and walking make us live. If an organisation (or person) is going to change or improve, then it can only achieve this by changing or improving its processes. An athlete is no more going to achieve a goal of racing faster by making every cell in his body race faster, than an organisation is going to achieve cost reduction through all departments reducing costs. The athlete needs many of his cells to actually slow right down in order for him to race fast, such as brain cells so they don't distract him from his focus, or his stomach cells so they don't waste energy on digestion or anxiety.

The organisation faces a risk of actually increasing costs if some of its parts, such as purchasing or maintenance, reduce costs. Some parts may actually need to increase costs in order for the whole organisation to reduce costs, such as the business improvement department so it can find the most sustainable ways to remove rework and waste from the organisations processes. Are you waiting for me to recite that modern cliché of "the whole is more than the sum of its parts"? Well, there you have it.

ANOTHER APPROACH: THINK ABOUT IMPACT, NOT ADOPTION

So instead of cascading strategy by basically getting every department to adopt or adapt a duplicate of the corporate strategy, we need a better way. Ideally, this means shifting some mental models (beliefs, concepts, assumptions) about how organisations work and how strategy is developed and cascaded. Not a quick or easy way. But a simple way to get started on improving how strategy is cascaded is to change the questions we ask to engage our departments with the corporate strategy.

Typically we ask questions like "what should our department's customer focus goal be?" or "what should our department's cost reduction goal be?". Instead we need to ask questions like "in what ways does our department impact on corporate customer focus?" and "in what ways does our department impact on organisational costs?". The answers are often totally different.

Instead of choosing a departmental goal of internal customer satisfaction because the corporate goal is about customer satisfaction, your department could end up with goals around service delivery cycle time, or product reliability or billing accuracy or consistent pricing or fast responses to customer enquiries or providing technical solutions in layman's terms for the sales team to respond to customer complaints. Anything to do with the process your department manages or works in, and how capable this process currently is. It's about understanding the unique impact your area or process has in improving the organisation's capability to achieve its strategic direction.

There are more formal planning approaches that cascade strategy this way, via organisational processes and their impact on corporate strategy, rather than via organisational departments and their adoption or adaptation of a version of the corporate strategy. But first you can get much better cascading of strategy by changing the questions that get people to explore what that strategy means to their areas and processes. It will encourage them to think about their unique contribution to how the organisation works, their unique contribution to the organisation's processes, and thus the results that matter most.

(1) I don't necessarily refer to the original Balanced Scorecard by Kaplan and Norton, as many organisations have adopted this phrase to mean their strategic framework, and they have chosen or adapted Kaplan and Norton's original four perspectives of Financial, Customer, Internal Business Process, and Learning and Growth.

(2) If you haven't come across this measure, the lost time injury frequency rate or LTIFR, you can find it everywhere on the internet. It's a standard safety measure adopted by many organisations.

Stacey Barr is a specialist in business performance measurement, helping people get the data and information that tells them how their business is performing, and how to make it perform better. Sign up for Stacey's free Handy Hints at http://www.staceybarr.com

---

Google News Updated : Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:25:40 GMT Aid agencies scramble to help flood victims - CNN CBC.ca Aid agencies scramble to help flood victims CNN - 39 minutes ago (CNN) -- The grinding misery triggered by the massive floods in a downtrodden part of northeastern India and across the border in Nepal persisted Friday, with government and aid agencies swinging into action to help the 2 million-plus people fleeing ... India: Up to 2000 feared dead in Bihar floods guardian.co.uk Millions displaced in Bihar floods PRESS TV Reuters India - CNN International - New York Times all 551 news articles Publ.Date : Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:45:57 GMT Obama’s Plane Palin Problem - FOXNews BBC News Obama’s Plane Palin Problem FOXNews - 2 hours ago by Major Garrett Reporters covering Barack Obama heard the news aboard Obama 1 (the campaign for the first time chartered a second plane for the swelling press corps), just before takeoff. Video: Raw Video: Schwarzenegger Praises Palin kcratv “Tougher in Alaskaâ€� host Geo Beach discusses Sarah Palin Christian Science Monitor CBS News - Chicago Tribune - The Star-Ledger - NJ.com - Seattle Post Intelligencer all 5,468 news articles Publ.Date : Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:07:29 GMT Boeing union leaders recommend strike - MarketWatch Washington Post Boeing union leaders recommend strike MarketWatch - 1 hour ago By MarketWatch Leaders of the International Machinists and Aerospace Workers on Friday rejected Boeing's third and final contract proposal and recommended its workers vote to go on strike. Union Leaders Reject Boeing Contract Offer Wall Street Journal Boeing Union Urges Workers to Reject Offer, Setting Up Strike Bloomberg Bizjournals.com - guardian.co.uk - The Associated Press - TheStreet.com all 1,041 news articles Publ.Date : Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:15:15 GMT Microwave baby killer convicted - BBC News BBC News Microwave baby killer convicted BBC News - 3 hours ago A US court in Dayton, Ohio, has convicted a mother of murdering her one-month-old daughter by burning her to death in a microwave oven. Video: Prosecutor: Ohio Mom Killed Baby in Microwave AssociatedPress US jury convicts mom in microwaved-baby case International Herald Tribune ToTheCenter.com - WZTV - NBC6.net - Dayton Daily News all 689 news articles Publ.Date : Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:30:22 GMT US Economy: Spending Slows, Inflation Accelerates (Update1) - Bloomberg Washington Post US Economy: Spending Slows, Inflation Accelerates (Update1) Bloomberg - 6 hours ago By Shobhana Chandra Aug. 29 (Bloomberg) -- US consumer spending grew at a slower pace in July as the impact of the tax rebates faded and a pickup in inflation eroded Americans' buying power. Bonds fall on mixed economic reports CNNMoney.com Consumer spending flags, but confidence rises Reuters Wall Street Journal - New York Times - MarketWatch - AHN all 520 news articles Publ.Date : Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:25:06 GMT Protests Rise in Thailand In Challenge to Regime - Wall Street Journal GulfNews Protests Rise in Thailand In Challenge to Regime Wall Street Journal - 1 hour ago By JAMES HOOKWAY and STEPHEN WRIGHT BANGKOK -- Waves of antigovernment protests spread beyond Thailand's capital Friday as clashes between police and demonstrators intensified, forcing the closure of several regional airports and disrupting rail ... Thai protest alliance not so happy with democracy The Associated Press US asks Thailand to end crisis through democratic means AFP New York Times - BBC News - guardian.co.uk - Reuters all 2,421 news articles Publ.Date : Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:33:23 GMT Earwax: Too Much of a Good Thing? - WebMD eFluxMedia Earwax: Too Much of a Good Thing? WebMD - 5 hours ago By Kelley Colihan Aug. 29, 2008 -- The body is a miraculous mechanism. Consider the once-lowly earwax. People used to try to remove it. Leave That Ear Wax Alone Washington Post National Guideline Against Ear Poking eFluxMedia MSNBC - RedOrbit - MedPage Today - eMaxHealth.com all 36 news articles Publ.Date : Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:32:14 GMT Automate Your Blogging RSS For Web Pages

PARLOT::Ebooks, Scripts, Websites, and more...

Adsense websites

Innovation Management ? Raw brainpower versus experience

Creativity can be defined as problem identification and idea generation... Read More

Work Priorities: Where Can You Spend Your Time Most Effectively?

Understanding where you can spend time most effectively requires concentration... Read More

To Meet or Not to Meet - What are the Questions?

Meetings can be a total waste of time or a... Read More

Think Before You Talk

What you say to other people can make or break... Read More

Unveiling the Value of Your Expertise

All of us have knowledge, expertise, and experience that others... Read More

Why All Managers Are Alike

Because, like you I suspect, they have key target audiences... Read More

Beyond Management Coaching: When Things Are Getting Out of Control

Leaders and Managers often ask us, 'What do you do... Read More

Does Your Management Style Remind People Of Something They Read In Dilbert?

With thanks to Jeff Foxworthy, the comedian who does the... Read More

Tales from the Corporate Frontlines: Coworker and Caretaker

This article relates to the Coworkers competency, commonly evaluated in... Read More

Survival of the Fittest: The Road to Human Extinction

I was watching a TV program some months ago about... Read More

Employers - Protect Yourself from Custody Battles that Hold Your Company Hostage

Child custody? How'd that get to be an employer's concern?When... Read More

Delegation - The Basic Steps To Reducing Your Workload And Creating A Successful Team

If you have a task greater than you can handle... Read More

Delegation: When to Delegate, Who to Delegate to

There are some very simple guides for delegation.Most people delegate... Read More

What Your Employees Want You to Know (But You Might Be Afraid to Ask)

This is a challenge for every company owner and manager.... Read More

Best Workplaces

The Best Workplaces report (Financial Times, April 28, 2005) notes... Read More

Innovation Management ? Selecting Good Ideas

Creativity can be defined as problem identification and idea generation... Read More

Delegation for Business Leaders - How Letting Go Works

A leader's role is to focus on those areas of... Read More

Allowing Employees Responsibility

Merely assigning a task with detailed instructions is not effective... Read More

Leading Meetings: The Top Three Challenges

What do people really find challenging about leading meetings? Here... Read More

How Businesses Can Stop Wallowing in Bad Debt and Prevent It in the Future

"Become the Squeaky Wheel", a new book just published, explains... Read More

Why People Resist Us

There's a one-word reason most ideas never see the light... Read More

Diversity Training: The Worst Possible Reasons to Request Executive Funding

You're on your organization's diversity committee. You have the best... Read More

Cold Water Comments - What They Are and How to Manage Them!

Cold Water Comments - What They Are and How to... Read More

Knowledge Management - Lessons Learned and How To Identify Them

Many organisations use the term "lessons learned" to describe the... Read More

Creative and Innovative Culture, Change Management ? Three Easy Tests

Creativity can be defined as problem identification and idea generation... Read More