The Happiness of Others

Is there any necessary connection between our actions and the happiness of others? Disregarding for a moment the murkiness of the definitions of "actions" in philosophical literature - two types of answers were hitherto provided.

Sentient Beings (referred to, in this essay, as "Humans" or "persons") seem either to limit each other - or to enhance each other's actions. Mutual limitation is, for instance, evident in game theory. It deals with decision outcomes when all the rational "players" are fully aware of both the outcomes of their actions and of what they prefer these outcomes to be. They are also fully informed about the other players: they know that they are rational, too, for instance. This, of course, is a very farfetched idealization. A state of unbounded information is nowhere and never to be found. Still, in most cases, the players settle down to one of the Nash equilibria solutions. Their actions are constrained by the existence of the others.

The "Hidden Hand" of Adam Smith (which, among other things, benignly and optimally regulates the market and the price mechanisms) - is also a "mutually limiting" model. Numerous single participants strive to maximize their (economic and financial) outcomes - and end up merely optimizing them. The reason lies in the existence of others within the "market". Again, they are constrained by other people's motivations, priorities ands, above all, actions.

All the consequentialist theories of ethics deal with mutual enhancement. This is especially true of the Utilitarian variety. Acts (whether judged individually or in conformity to a set of rules) are moral, if their outcome increases utility (also known as happiness or pleasure). They are morally obligatory if they maximize utility and no alternative course of action can do so. Other versions talk about an "increase" in utility rather than its maximization. Still, the principle is simple: for an act to be judged "moral, ethical, virtuous, or good" - it must influence others in a way which will "enhance" and increase their happiness.

The flaws in all the above answers are evident and have been explored at length in the literature. The assumptions are dubious (fully informed participants, rationality in decision making and in prioritizing the outcomes, etc.). All the answers are instrumental and quantitative: they strive to offer a moral measuring rod. An "increase" entails the measurement of two states: before and after the act. Moreover, it demands full knowledge of the world and a type of knowledge so intimate, so private - that it is not even sure that the players themselves have conscious access to it. Who goes around equipped with an exhaustive list of his priorities and another list of all the possible outcomes of all the acts that he may commit?

But there is another, basic flaw: these answers are descriptive, observational, phenomenological in the restrictive sense of these words. The motives, the drives, the urges, the whole psychological landscape behind the act are deemed irrelevant. The only thing relevant is the increase in utility/happiness. If the latter is achieved - the former might as well not have existed. A computer, which increases happiness is morally equivalent to a person who achieves a quantitatively similar effect. Even worse: two persons acting out of different motives (one malicious and one benevolent) will be judged to be morally equivalent if their acts were to increase happiness similarly.

But, in life, an increase in utility or happiness or pleasure is CONDITIONED upon, is the RESULT of the motives behind the acts that led to it. Put differently: the utility functions of two acts depend decisively on the motivation, drive, or urge behind them. The process, which leads to the act is an inseparable part of the act and of its outcomes, including the outcomes in terms of the subsequent increase in utility or happiness. We can safely distinguish the "utility contaminated" act from the "utility pure (or ideal)" act.

If a person does something which is supposed to increase the overall utility - but does so in order to increase his own utility more than the expected average utility increase - the resulting increase will be lower. The maximum utility increase is achieved overall when the actor forgoes all increase in his personal utility. It seems that there is a constant of utility increase and a conservation law pertaining to it. So that a disproportionate increase in one's personal utility translates into a decrease in the overall average utility. It is not a zero sum game because of the infiniteness of the potential increase - but the rules of distribution of the utility added after the act, seem to dictate an averaging of the increase in order to maximize the result.

The same pitfalls await these observations as did the previous ones. The players must be in the possession of full information at least regarding the motivation of the other players. "Why is he doing this?" and "why did he do what he did?" are not questions confined to the criminal courts. We all want to understand the "why's" of actions long before we engage in utilitarian calculations of increased utility. This also seems to be the source of many an emotional reaction concerning human actions. We are envious because we think that the utility increase was unevenly divided (when adjusted for efforts invested and for the prevailing cultural mores). We suspect outcomes that are "too good to be true". Actually, this very sentence proves my point: that even if something produces an increase in overall happiness it will be considered morally dubious if the motivation behind it remains unclear or seems to be irrational or culturally deviant.

Two types of information are, therefore, always needed: one (discussed above) concerns the motives of the main protagonists, the act-ors. The second type relates to the world. Full knowledge about the world is also a necessity: the causal chains (actions lead to outcomes), what increases the overall utility or happiness and for whom, etc. To assume that all the participants in an interaction possess this tremendous amount of information is an idealization (used also in modern theories of economy), should be regarded as such and not be confused with reality in which people approximate, estimate, extrapolate and evaluate based on a much more limited knowledge.

Two examples come to mind:

Aristotle described the "Great Soul". It is a virtuous agent (actor, player) that judges himself to be possessed of a great soul (in a self-referential evaluative disposition). He has the right measure of his worth and he courts the appreciation of his peers (but not of his inferiors) which he believes that he deserves by virtue of being virtuous. He has a dignity of demeanour, which is also very self-conscious. He is, in short, magnanimous (for instance, he forgives his enemies their offences). He seems to be the classical case of a happiness-increasing agent - but he is not. And the reason that he fails in qualifying as such is that his motives are suspect. Does he refrain from assaulting his enemies because of charity and generosity of spirit - or because it is likely to dent his pomposity? It is sufficient that a POSSIBLE different motive exist - to ruin the utilitarian outcome.

Adam Smith, on the other hand, adopted the spectator theory of his teacher Francis Hutcheson. The morally good is a euphemism. It is really the name provided to the pleasure, which a spectator derives from seeing a virtue in action. Smith added that the reason for this emotion is the similarity between the virtue observed in the agent and the virtue possessed by the observer. It is of a moral nature because of the object involved: the agent tries to consciously conform to standards of behaviour which will not harm the innocent, while, simultaneously benefiting himself, his family and his friends. This, in turn, will benefit society as a whole. Such a person is likely to be grateful to his benefactors and sustain the chain of virtue by reciprocating. The chain of good will, thus, endlessly multiply.

Even here, we see that the question of motive and psychology is of utmost importance. WHY is the agent doing what he is doing? Does he really conform to society's standards INTERNALLY? Is he GRATEFUL to his benefactors? Does he WISH to benefit his friends? These are all questions answerable only in the realm of the mind. Really, they are not answerable at all.

About The Author

Sam Vaknin is the author of "Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited" and the editor of mental health categories in The Open Directory, Suite101, and searcheurope.com.

His web site: http://samvak.tripod.com

Frequently asked questions regarding narcissism: http://samvak.tripod.com/faq1.html

Narcissistic Personality Disorder on Suite101: http://www.suite101.com/welcome.cfm/npd

In The News:


Google News
Updated : Sun, 07 Sep 2008 08:08:09 GMT

Hurricane Ike Strengthens to Category 4, Raises Fears From ... - FOXNews


Boston Globe
Hurricane Ike Strengthens to Category 4, Raises Fears From ...
FOXNews - 2 hours ago
Sept. 6: This satellite image taken at 3:45 pm EDT shows a swirl of clouds north of Hispaniola associated with Hurricane Ike. Sept.
Video: 'Dangerous' Ike Aims for Turks and Caicos AssociatedPress
Ike hits Turks and Caicos islands as Category 4 hurricane with ... CNN
BBC News - AFP - Opelousas Daily World - MarketWatch
all 3,099 news articles

Publ.Date : Sun, 07 Sep 2008 05:13:03 GMT

In the neighborhood of a title once again - Boston Globe


San Diego Union Tribune
In the neighborhood of a title once again
Boston Globe - 39 minutes ago
By Bud Collins Or should I say Herr Roger, as he is addressed in his hometown, Basel. He does better in this sector, the Flushing section of the New York borough of Queens, than he ever did in Switzerland, and Roger Federer says he feels "a little bit ...
Video: Federer Beats Djokovic to Reach US Open Final AssociatedPress
Federer Storms Into Final Washington Post
New York Times - Los Angeles Times - The Star-Ledger - NJ.com - Kentucky.com
all 2,911 news articles

Publ.Date : Sun, 07 Sep 2008 07:28:11 GMT

Google Chrome Reflects A Desktop In Decline - InformationWeek


News 8 Austin
Google Chrome Reflects A Desktop In Decline
InformationWeek - 10 hours ago
After 10 years as a company, Google is making the Chrome browser key to the coming of age of cloud computing, or software as a service.
Mozilla releases second Firefox 3.1 alpha CNET News
Mozilla updates Firefox 3.1 with Alpha 2 build Computerworld
Pittsburgh Post Gazette - PC World - CRN - Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
all 246 news articles

Publ.Date : Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:46:03 GMT

Evans KOs Liddell at UFC 88 - FOXSports.com

Evans KOs Liddell at UFC 88
FOXSports.com - 1 hour ago
by Elias Cepeda, InsideFighting.com Rashad Evans shot himself straight to the top of the long list of challengers in the UFC's light heavyweight division with a devastating knockout win over the sport of MMA's top name and former champion, ...
Rashad Evans knocks out Chuck Liddell The Associated Press
Liddell in need of a fresh approach Yahoo! Sports
USA Today - MMAjunkie.com - Bloody Elbow - Middletown Journal
all 229 news articles

Publ.Date : Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:18:30 GMT

Tracing TV's bloodlines - Cape Cod Times


Canada.com
Tracing TV's bloodlines
Cape Cod Times - 53 minutes ago
By CAPE COD TIMES Vampires are big business, whether dominating the best-seller list in Stephenie Meyer's "Twilight" series of books for three years or starring in an endless stream of movies that portray the mysterious bloodsuckers as scary, ...
'True Blood': Undead On Arrival Washington Post
'True Blood' offers edgy inspection of tolerance Akron Beacon Journal
Macon Telegraph - Salt Lake Tribune - E! Online - Arizona Daily Star
all 215 news articles

Publ.Date : Sun, 07 Sep 2008 07:14:40 GMT

Couric getting a kick out of Web freedom - Chicago Tribune


Washington Post
Couric getting a kick out of Web freedom
Chicago Tribune - 1 hour ago
By Matea Gold | Tribune Newspapers NEW YORK—Katie Couric was listening to Declan McCullagh, CNet's chief political correspondent, explain Barack Obama's and John McCain's stances on Net neutrality.
Survivors Enjoy Watching 'Stand Up To Cancer' cbs4denver.com
Katie Couric teams with rival anchors to 'Stand Up to Cancer' Los Angeles Times
CBS 2 - New York Daily News - mediabistro.com - TheDenverChannel.com
all 192 news articles

Publ.Date : Sun, 07 Sep 2008 07:04:17 GMT

EA's big bet on Spore - San Jose Mercury News


CBC.ca
EA's big bet on Spore
San Jose Mercury News - 1 hour ago
By Steve Johnson In unveiling their much-anticipated and long-delayed video game "Spore" in North America today, executives at Electronic Arts hope to counter critics who have faulted the Redwood City company for becoming fat and happy in recent years ...
In the Beginning, Finally Washington Post
Sims creator hopes to soar with Spore San Francisco Chronicle
InformationWeek - Macworld - CRN - Los Angeles Times
all 222 news articles

Publ.Date : Sun, 07 Sep 2008 07:07:31 GMT

RSS Parser
Increased Website Traffic


PARLOT::Ebooks, Scripts, Websites, and more...

Adsense websites

How to Be Happy!

How would you like to have at least an extra... Read More

Looking In The Eyes Of Happiness

From what you see around you in your daily lives,... Read More

Life or Lifestyle?

"When you live the life you were meant to live,... Read More

Creating Happiness

Whatever we want in life, a partner, more money, good... Read More

Uncover Emotional Secrets and Live a Happier Life

Can you remember a time when you became a little... Read More

5 Keys to Understanding Why Your Life (probably) Sucks! #3

The outcome of Reason # 2 is that you become... Read More

Simple Pleasures: Ingredients to Feed Your Spirit.

"When we do something we love, again and again, our... Read More

The Golden Moments in Life

This month I'm going to talk about something I've never... Read More

7 Things Happy People Know How To Do

Ever notice how some people just seem to be able... Read More

About Happiness and Fulfillment

During a FULFILLMENT seminar, at the University of Arizona for... Read More

You Need To Start To Like Yourself

If you have a very low self esteem or a... Read More

Joy Is Sexy

Joy is sexy because in embracing our joy, we embrace... Read More

You...Your Emotions...Your Relations...Your Happiness and Your Life...

We are living in an era, where relations' management is... Read More

Love, Uncles, and Etymology

Thwack! . . . Thwack! . . . Thwack! Steven... Read More

How To Live Happily Ever After

In life, many of us simply plunge ahead, only to... Read More

Can Existential Therapy Give You a Sense of Wellbeing?

My journey to becoming a therapist began with a desire... Read More

Happiest Person In America: Whats Sex Got To Do With It?

Who is the happiest person in America? USA Today featured... Read More

How To Achieve Absolute Happiness

Everyone wants to be happy. When you decide to be... Read More

Keys to Happiness

"Happiness is the whole aim and end of human... Read More

A Model of Happiness

Everyone I've ever met considers happiness to be desirable. There... Read More

Happy Buttons

What makes you happy? What are the simple pleasures that... Read More

Ode to Chocolate

Chocolate delays reality. When I am eating chocolate, everything is... Read More

Finding Purpose and Meaning in Life

A friend once said to me, "There is no meaning... Read More

Love is All You Need

Boiled down to all of our essence, all we really... Read More

See for Yourself : 12 Step Tools Can Bring Happy, Joyous and Free into Everyones Life

We are all familiar with or have heard of the... Read More